{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_612090249\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_612090249\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wk3.org\/u\/tzafrir\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/03ef19f9b40959d50aab3e07a22fbb62-6\" alt=\"tzafrir@wk3.org\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/wk3.org\/u\/tzafrir\">tzafrir@wk3.org<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/007f5480c8c301370afe00163e73147f\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-10-04T13:52:37+03:00\">Fri, 04 Oct 2019 13:52:37 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-612090249\" class=\"reshared-content\">I'd say that 25% of the researchers in social sciences give all others a bad name.<br \/><br \/>There's great work being done in psychology, which every sceptic should be aware of. Political sciences have lots of very interesting and well-done works. Likewise is economy and the rest of those fields.<br \/><br \/>Science is about using the proper method. Using proper methods can and should be done is &quot;softer&quot; fields as well. Yes, it's easier to fake. And there are whole fields there that don't car enough about using proper methods. But you shouldn't just ignore everything. Even the problematic field of gender studies occasionally produces useful results.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}