My religion strictly forbids me believe anything.<\/blockquote>
I have seen you make this statement before. I interpret this as a discordian trick. I am either to believe you don't believe in anything you say, or you are provoking an argument on semantics. So I'm inclined to let this bait dangle. I'm only saying this to explain myself.I will quote myself in this case:
Fans of Western European hegemony often resort to history (especially of ancient Rome) to justify their privileged...<\/blockquote>
There are at least two problems with this. The first is that (again) since the claim is made that all of history has been faked, then your argument becomes something like: "no the history you know is a lie, here read my true history and you will see that I am right.<\/em>" If we just accept this then any argument can be won with by saying this. And in practice this is little different then what you are claiming the fake historians have done to us.
The second problem with the quote is that I was specifically talking about the industrial revolution. That wasn't even mentioned in your quoted materials.
Just take computers as an example, who invented them and where were they invented? Well that's just one thing, you can't say there is anything special about "the west" for inventing that one thing, right? Well fine, how about automobiles, airplanes, lightbulbs, telephones, radios, etc... Who invented all that and where were they invented? There is enough sources of written history from these times that claiming this history was all falsified is dubious.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>","width":640,"height":426}