{"type":"rich","html":"
\"Hartmut<\/a>Hartmut Noack<\/a> wrote the following post <\/a>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 01:34:08 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div>
@ivan zlax<\/a> OK, so its the Mohel, the Rabbi, who performs the circumcission. I find it perfectly plausible, that that circumcission could be the date set as the "birth" of the Nazarene, he was a jew and rituals like the circumcission where considered the beginning of life in many cultures.

I only do not understand, why this should be relevant.

I mean: the man is dead. For nearly 2000 years now, given, that the tradition is at least trustable in his time of birth or circumcission. Other details are more or less doubtful such as the birth at Bethlehem(he was from Nazareth and the reasons, why his parents should have traveled to Bethlehem are unconfirmed, also Bethlehem was the town of the house of David, so to present a new king of the jews is easier, if he is born there...

What I am trying to say is: Jesua ben Miriam of Nazareth is important for christians but irrelevant for date measurement.

One last time: calendars are about measuring timespans. The refence day is arbitrary and only used, to set a basis for the number, a year is labeled with. Just like UNIX timestamp is zeroed at 1.1.1970. All calendars can be synchronised with others, at least all solar based ones. And the lunar ones can be projected. Since the reference point, that the church has set arbitrary in the julian calendar, we counted 2019 rounds of earth around the sun. You may accept that or not, it is plain truth. And writing "1" as "jota" may be snobbish but it is perfectly plausible. More plausible than your fantasms of "1000 years deleted" by orders of magnitude.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>","width":640,"height":426}