Whatever. You can't use NASA as a source and then moan someone else's research was done with "capitalist money". NASA is paid for by capitalist money.
According to growers data, 1500ppm is twice as fast as 400ppm, which is a result of the doubling of yield growth.<\/blockquote>
For one you are confusing yield with growth which is why your 30-40% figure is meaningless. An increase in weight isn't a corollary of nutrient content. And it's not a study of food crops.Once again, I ask you, if you can\u2019t give us specific data from your \u201cresearch\u201d, Talk about the specific meaning of the PPM if you are ready to answer for your words.<\/blockquote>
In rice crops just increase the CO2 by 50% from 400ppm to 600ppm.
https:\/\/advances.sciencemag.org\/content\/4\/5\/eaaq1012<\/a><\/a>
<\/span> Study of Chinese and Japanese rice crops.
"When grown under field conditions at these anticipated [CO2] a significant reduction (an average of \u221210.3%) in protein relative to current [CO2] was observed for all rice cultivars (Fig. 1). Similarly, significant reductions in iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) were also observed (\u22128.0 and \u22125.1%, respectively) among all rice cultivars tested (Fig. 2)"
The experiments were run using a co2 concentration of 560-90 ppm as predicted level of end of 21st century. Imagine the reduction at 1500ppm! Still we can always put all growing inside plastic rooms and create some more CO2 by burning some more forests the greening created.
meta-analysis
https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/j.1365-2486.2007.01511.x<\/a><\/a>
<\/span>
this allows for even higher concentration of CO2.
Results: All of the crops included in the analysis had significantly lower protein concentrations when grown at elevated vs. ambient CO2 (Fig. 1). For potato, the mean reduction in protein was 13.9% and for the grain crops (barley, rice and wheat) the reduction in protein was 15.3%, 9.9% and 9.8%, respectively. For soybean the reduction was a much smaller 1.4%. "
Data to support your speculation that the rise in CO2 levels is having or will have a positive impact on the poorest people? None. And we didn't even take into account population growth yet.<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>","width":640,"height":426}