{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_1355981701\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_1355981701\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/eyespeer\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/d615bb2c77dc1d4fa5e108b43354cd52-6\" alt=\"peer of eyes\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/eyespeer\">peer of eyes<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/7a21d6b05f730137c9a4005056264835\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-05-23T13:28:49+03:00\">Thu, 23 May 2019 13:28:49 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-1355981701\" class=\"reshared-content\">The funny thing is that systemic issues with the military and OTOH bad apples, can become one and the same by way of having the Commander in Chief, the top of the command chain, himself a bad apple. To attain military-grade robustness, Kant's imperative should require not just the test of desirability of universal adoption of the contemplated rules but also universal adoption <em>except for arbitrarily inconvenient bad apples.<\/em><\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}