{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_884596080\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_884596080\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/starry_gordon\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/d2bfdcf2fb07e7402e68a4f1843d423f-6\" alt=\"Starry Gordon\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/starry_gordon\">Starry Gordon<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/8c167790dbfa013787cf047d7b62795e\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-10-29T00:48:05+03:00\">Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:48:05 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-884596080\" class=\"reshared-content\">Since Social Darwinism is a specific theory about the evolution of humans, I think I would know whether I believed in it.<br \/><br \/>As for Kropotkin, I was thinking of microorganisms -- it took them a long, long time to invent multi-cellular forms. I think this implies that substantial energy inputs were needed to bring it about. And then when you go to the other end of the complexity spectrum, it seems that human beings went along for hundreds of thousands of years before inventing anything more complicated than families and small gangs or packs.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}