{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_1012197418\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_1012197418\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/podricing.pw\/u\/wolf\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/990c30f6e011ba32d357a8d6296a53a9-6\" alt=\"Wolf\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/podricing.pw\/u\/wolf\">Wolf<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/a0e16420c2900137dbcd071a8f56983e\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-09-26T16:36:54+03:00\">Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:36:54 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-1012197418\" class=\"reshared-content\">So when people of the west do something good, like inventing technologies we all have the luxury of taking for granted, you attribute this to the doings of \u201cmankind.\u201d Yet when people of the west have done something of which you disapprove, like say say colonialism for example, then you attribute this to the monolithic western colonialists. This sort of logic is called double standard.<br \/><blockquote>Please show me some written source from 1500 years ago, or at least 1000 years ago, that you consider authoritative.<\/blockquote><br \/>I don\u2019t have to go back that far, I\u2019m talking about inventions made since the industrial revolution here. There are ample sources from this time on, and although individually they may be suspect, when taken together we can surmise a good idea of what transpired, by who and where.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}