{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_1361723284\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_1361723284\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/ahimsa\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/acc44bda-4a4a-45cf-84e5-e4bdff66f9ab-6\" alt=\"ahimsa@diasp.org\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/ahimsa\">ahimsa@diasp.org<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/a98b4460e7950137699d047d7b62795e\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-11-12T19:16:09+03:00\">Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:16:09 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-1361723284\" class=\"reshared-content\">Well mutual aid makes a lot of sense to me as well, from the simple logic that given a system of symbiotic natural selection, the end result could be interpreted as survival of the fittest. I was wondering about colonialism, power-tactics etc, if the confederate-nature of treaty-politics actually excuses the nations from ethical standards beyond their confederate bubble? I think I anwered my own question, because I just thought that the same applies to those who would speak aggressively towards those who challenge their opinion, the bubble itself meaning more than that which it contains.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}