{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_10197611\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_10197611\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/ads\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/4dafa8d6071ad922cbcc87ab9a57dd0a-6\" alt=\"Andreas Scherbaum\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/ads\">Andreas Scherbaum<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/ae7ec76044df01379529005056264835\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-04-19T17:45:21+03:00\">Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:45:21 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-10197611\" class=\"reshared-content\">@<a class=\"zrl\" href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/channel\/zlax\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">ivan zlax<\/a> None of your links proof anything, and bringing a public denial as proof that IBM is involved is surreal.<br \/><br \/>But back to the topic: I asked what proof do you have that IBM \/ Red Hat somehow manipulate the network tools. Posting history from WWII as answer is just distraction. Get back to the topic, or leave it as it is.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}