{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_100970330\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_100970330\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/urbanroman\"><img src=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/photo\/f1a4172a1afc05e5240ec7368ee0466c-6\" alt=\"BR 549 \u260e\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/diasp.org\/u\/urbanroman\">BR 549 \u260e<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/ussr.win\/display\/d38fafa035f4013780b6047d7b62795e\">post <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-03-31T18:08:55+03:00\">Sun, 31 Mar 2019 18:08:55 +0300<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-100970330\" class=\"reshared-content\"><blockquote>BTW: in the year 100 the christian sect was irrelevant for roman politics, it had not even formed as we know it today, basically it was a strange sect whithin the known judean religion. And even the judean religion was quite different from the judean religion we know today.<\/blockquote><br \/>@<a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/zettberlin\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Hartmut Noack<\/a>, that was my point. A casual observation of the 12th century shows that it is clearly different from the 2nd century. Historians weren't writing about 'year 100' in the year 100. Almost nobody knew it was year 100. But by the year 1100, Europe was being built up, and historians were using the Julian calendar, originating on the estimated year of Jesus' birth. Today's Gregorian calendar only differs from it by a few days.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}