Sadly, @M. Dent
totally missed the point, and think that ad nominem attacks could make you appear you're right. Too bad.
(By the way, he seems to ignore that I'm a Hubzilla advocacy outside the zotiverse (it woul be useless inside), and he didn't search very long
about my records in the community. In short, a useless comment of a upset man... Forgettable)
: yes, the title is provocative. But sometimes, some one has to thumped the table. I'm glad to see people agree, but it would be better if they expressed it before my post.
: here it ishttps://www.w3.org/community/blog/2019/03/11/proposed-group-zot-protocol-community-group/
Once at least 5 people have supported the proposal, the group will be
launched and people will be able to join.
Now it's your turn.
It's strange. I see that post from my cloned #hubzilla
hub, but it's missing from my main hub...
Anyway, thanks @Max
for the group. Let's see how long it takes to reach the required number to open, and I hope that #activitypub
devs and others devs outside the #zot
community will join it too to help to improve the documentation¹ and the protocol itself.
¹ : a basic requirement for the documentation is to be understandable by #fediverse
developers who are currently not aware of #zot