Sadly, @
M. Dent totally missed the point, and think that ad nominem attacks could make you appear you're right. Too bad.
(By the way, he seems to ignore that I'm a Hubzilla advocacy outside the zotiverse (it woul be useless inside), and he
didn't search very long about my records in the community. In short, a useless comment of a upset man... Forgettable)
@
ivan zlax, @
paulfree14 : yes, the title is provocative. But sometimes, some one has to thumped the table. I'm glad to see people agree, but it would be better if they expressed it before my post.
@
Mario Vavti : here it is
https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2019/03/11/proposed-group-zot-protocol-community-group/Once at least 5 people have supported the proposal, the group will be
launched and people will be able to join.
Now it's your turn.
It's strange. I see that post from my cloned #
hubzilla hub, but it's missing from my main hub...
Anyway, thanks @
Max for the group. Let's see how long it takes to reach the required number to open, and I hope that #
activitypub devs and others devs outside the #
zot community will join it too to help to improve the documentation¹ and the protocol itself.
¹ : a basic requirement for the documentation is to be understandable by #
fediverse developers who are currently not aware of #
zot.