-

2023-06-11 17:13:26

ivan zlax

zlax@ussr.win

On this day exactly 31 years ago, a girl named Severn Suzuki gave a speech at the UN conference in Rio de Janeiro that "silenced the world for 6 minutes". As she stated in the speech read by her from a piece of paper, she and her friends had raised the money to go to the UN conference in Brazil and tell adults to change their behaviour because they do not know how to fix holes in the ozone layer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC0QZ9G_9k0

Severn is the daughter of popular Canadian TV presenter and environmental activist David Suzuki and author Tara Elizabeth Callis. It is worth noting that the man who invented the concept of "climate change" was also Canadian; he is Maurice Strong, chairman of the board of the Petro-Canada Royal Oil Corporation. It was this Canadian oil tycoon who organised the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the largest political gathering in history, at which a Canadian girl spoke and declared that she had "no secret agenda, fighting for her future".

At this conference, the girl's sensuous speech was followed by the adoption of the UN "Agenda 21" "with regard to sustainable development". A year before Agenda 21 was published, Alexander King's (one of the developers of the concept of sustainable development) book, The First Global Revolution, stated:

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill… All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.” (p.75)

Agenda 21 codifies the concept of sustainable development, entailing: land use restrictions; massive constraints on energy consumption; reductions in water usage; installation of smart meters; increases in the number of city-center dwellings; smaller apartments and living units; and restrictions on travel and transportation, in addition to other measures. As Rosa Koire, author of the original exposé of Agenda 21, Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21, wrote in her book: "The push is for people to get off of the land, become more dependent, come into the cities… Out of their private homes and into condos.” (p.16)

"The plan is a whole life plan. It involves the educational system, the energy market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care system, food production, and more. It is a plan to inventory and control all of the natural resources, means of production, and human beings in the world. The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice." (p.17)

"In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners… Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by a globalist governing body… In anticipation of our objections to such plans, our civil rights will be dissolved." (p.13)

Furthermore, Koire points out that the Agenda 21 plans are not openly provided to national policymakers to be debated and filtered through normal democratic channels. Instead they are the subject of an end-run around the democratic process by being given directly to municipal and local bodies to implement as if the ideas were local initiatives. Koire identifies the body known as ICLEI – the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives – as the conduit for influencing local governments to adopt the UN plans.

The triumph of these UN initiatives was the so-called "Kyoto Protocol", an international treaty negotiated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions into the earth's atmosphere to counteract global warming. Being a supplementary document to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted in Rio, the Protocol itself was adopted in Kyoto, Japan 5 years later.

North American countries were the most active in promoting this international treaty: in Canada, it was promoted by Maurice Strong himself, in the US by the Rockefellers, through a number of family foundations and initiatives. Meanwhile, the US signed but did not ratify the Protocol, while Canada formally withdrew from it before renewal. American scientists have demonstrated to the public that there was no scientific basis for ratifying the treaty: http://www.petitionproject.org

Meanwhile, the Russian Academy of Sciences made similar comments on the Kyoto Protocol's provisions: "Kyoto Protocol has no scientific justification"; "ratification of the Protocol, in view of the persistent linkage between CO2 emissions and carbon-based economic growth, would legally limit the growth rate of the Russian GDP". But despite the opinion of Russian scientists, the Russian government signed and ratified the treaty, as did most other countries, agreeing to "voluntarily" limit industrial production in the name of fighting global warming.

Eleven years ago, the Kyoto Protocol on climate change was extended for 8 years, probably due to the alarmist and apocalyptic rhetoric in the western media: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1100990/kyoto-protocol-extended-2020-fight-climate-change

Kyoto Protocol extended to 2020 to fight climate change
Published: 12:00am, 9 Dec, 2012

But after that, once again, despite an obvious attempt by the Western media to promote the climate change agenda, the Protocol's extension has failed, and for the third year in a row, UN member states are no longer forced to "voluntarily" limit their industrial production in the name of fighting climate change. Of course, China and the Russian Federation have benefited the most from the end of the Protocol.

Perhaps there is some irony in this, that the process of adopting the Kyoto Protocol began with a successful sensual speech by a girl at the UN, and ended with a failed sensual speech by another girl at the UN, the daughter of popular Sweden singer and environmental activist Malena Ernman and actor Svante Thunberg.

#agenda21 #america #canada #climatechange #climatestrike #documents #fridaysforfuture #greta #hoax #kyotoprotocol #metaprogramming #revision #technocracy #un #us #who #weather

english

2023-06-11 21:20:38

ivan zlax

zlax@ussr.win

LackmustestTester wrote:

There's another kid, Felix Finkbeiner, who held a speech in front of the UN in 2011. His organisation 'Plant for the Planet' has an interesting background, too.

    Almost everything about the organization seems credible. The face of the initiative is 23-year-old Felix Finkbeiner, a climate activist with a Federal Medal of Merit, who can talk so convincingly about reforestation on Markus Lanz's talk show that you follow his words with rapt attention. His father Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of the foundation, was vice president of the German branch of the Club of Rome.

    The German Federal Ministry for Development and Cooperation (BMZ) praises PftP as the "world's largest reforestation program" and a trustworthy "compensation partner" and funds its projects to the tune of millions. Patrons include former Environment Minister Klaus Töpfer and Prince Albert of Monaco. As if that were not enough, the activists of Fridays for Future Germany have their donations transferred to a PftP trust account. If Greta's movement in Germany should cease to exist, as the trust agreement for 2019 states, the donations will be used to plant trees in Yucatán.

    Although PftP publishes numerous figures on its project, on closer inspection many of the details turn out to be contradictory, exaggerated or simply false. The picture that emerges is of a non-transparent organization that collects millions of euros in donations from citizens and companies with questionable promises in the name of climate protection.

    With a great story, a father and his son from the Bavarian province made it all the way to the Washington Post. In 2007, Felix Finkbeiner, then nine years old, called for tree planting at his school. Inspired by the program "Plant for the Planet: The Billion Tree Campaign," with which the United Nations (UN) calls for tree planting, he wants children in every country to plant one million trees to reduce CO₂. The student's dream hits the media.

    At the time, his father, entrepreneur Frithjof Finkbeiner, is involved in two foundations on sustainability. The initiative organizes one-day educational academies to train children and young people to become "ambassadors for climate justice" and collects donations for tree planting abroad.

    To the outside world, Felix, the schoolboy, is always presented as the head of the movement. However, former employees of the foundation and companions of Frithjof Finkbeiner tell us that during these years it was mainly his father who was the driving force behind PftP.

    Among other things, they describe him as a "visionary with no connection to reality," a man with a strong need for recognition who built "castles in the air." His life, according to press articles, is the story of a successful entrepreneur who sold his company in 1994 after a speech by Al Gore to devote himself to climate change.

    Various articles that have appeared about father and son give the impression that Frithjof Finkbeiner himself is the source of this conversion story. When asked, he does not want to comment on this. Yet there is another incident from that time that points to other motives. In that year 1994, several of Finkbeiner's companies went bankrupt, and Finkbeiner later became insolvent.