It has long been known that official documents published by the Kremlin, at least for the last 10 years
, do not contain the signature
of the responsible person - the president. The Prime Minister of Armenia demonstrated how international documents are handled: https://www.facebook.com/nikol.pashinyan/photos/a.1895098537477199/2478327485820965/?type=3&theater
The Prime Minister of Armenia has exposed Putin's doppelgangershttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQuEk_cUceY
All heads of state signed the agreement as people, with a pen with blue paste, and only the Russian president used a copy made in advance instead of the signature. For morons who will write in comments that it is "normal practice", that there is nothing unusual in it, I will say - try to come to any bank in Russia to get a loan, and in the contract, instead of signing with a pen, show them the same as in "Putin" signature, only your own - what will they tell you there?
Now let's answer the question - why do other leaders know and understand that instead of real Putin, some double sign a treaty with them, and even photocopied signatures - why do they know and keep quiet? And because it is profitable for them. As long as they benefit from the agreements allegedly signed with Putin, they will remain silent. And if it becomes unprofitable for them, they will spit on the treaty obligations on the grounds that Putin's signature is not real. If they talk openly about Putin's doppelgangers, then relations with the Kremlin mafia will deteriorate, and it will be difficult to have some relations, even trade relations. But if they keep silent, it is a means of blackmail, so that in some situation the Kremlin will give something fot the silence of some head of state.